<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>StepRep Blog &#187; advertising</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.steprepblog.com/tag/advertising/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.steprepblog.com</link>
	<description>Online reputation management</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 16:53:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>What Kind of Advertising do You Trust?</title>
		<link>http://www.steprepblog.com/2009/01/21/what-kind-of-advertising-do-you-trust/</link>
		<comments>http://www.steprepblog.com/2009/01/21/what-kind-of-advertising-do-you-trust/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 21:12:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Tomlin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Belkin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Projects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reputation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VendAsta]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://steprepblog.com/?p=61</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There was a story in the New York Times about Belkin paying people for writing positive reviews.  This was an interesting story to me.  Apparently, a Belkin employee was paying people to write favorable reviews on sites like Amazon.  The general reaction was very negative and a  general concensus was that this represents very poor [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There was a story in the New York Times about <a href="http://pogue.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/01/19/belkin-employee-paid-users-for-good-reviews/" target="_blank">Belkin paying people for writing positive reviews</a>.  This was an interesting story to me.  Apparently, a Belkin employee was paying people to write favorable reviews on sites like Amazon.  The general reaction was very negative and a  general concensus was that this represents very poor reputation management practices.  But I began to take a more critical look at this and wondered how it was really different from other forms of advertising.</p>
<p>1.  How is the <em>intention</em> different from a company paying for an ad in certain media and claiming a poor product is very good?  Consider a company that has consumer reports, community feedback and perhaps even internal research which confirms to them that their product or service is poor.</p>
<p>2.  How is this different from an infomercial where a well know personality is paid to endorse a product or service?</p>
<p>3.  Is this different from a company paying a subject matter expert for a product review.  Consider different types of marketing arrangements.  Sometimes an expert is paid money for a review and sometimes there is a mutual co-marketing arrangement in place.</p>
<p>4.  Consider companies that pay people to send business their way on a referral basis.  Have you ever been to a place like Cancun Mexico and if you ask someone directions to a restaurant or bar, they give you a business card of a place with their initial on the back.  They are paid a referral.</p>
<p>5.  What about sites that just sell ads and link to &#8216;great services&#8217;.</p>
<p>I guess the key question here, is what actually makes advertising and promotion reputable?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.steprepblog.com/2009/01/21/what-kind-of-advertising-do-you-trust/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

